Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle¡¯s classification of malocclusion

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2017³â 47±Ç 3È£ p.151 ~ 157
¹èÁ¤ÀÎ, ¼Õ¿ì¼º, ±è¼º½Ä, ¹Ú¼öº´, ±è¿ëÀÏ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹èÁ¤ÀΠ( Bae Jung-In ) - Pusan National University Dental Hospital Department of Orthodontics
¼Õ¿ì¼º ( Son Woo-Sung ) - Pusan National University Dental Hospital Department of Orthodontics
±è¼º½Ä ( Kim Seong-Sik ) - Pusan National University Dental Hospital Department of Orthodontics
¹Ú¼öº´ ( Park Soo-Byung ) - Pusan National University Dental Hospital Department of Orthodontics
±è¿ëÀÏ ( Kim Yong-Il ) - Pusan National University Dental Hospital Department of Orthodontics

Abstract


Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in masticatory efficiency among patients with different Angle¡¯s classes of malocclusion and to assess the correlation between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area.

Methods: The mixing ability index (MAI) was calculated for measuring masticatory efficiency of 61 adult patients according to Angle¡¯s classifications of malocclusion. The study included 25, 15, and 21 patients with Angle¡¯s Class I, II, and III malocclusions, respectively. Silicone interocclusal recording material was used to measure the occlusal contact area.

Results: Both the MAI and occlusal contact area showed the highest average values in the Class I malocclusion group, followed by the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups. No significant difference was observed in the MAI values between the Class I and Class II malocclusion groups (p > 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the Class I and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.01) and between the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.05). A weak positive correlation was also observed between the MAI and occlusal contact area (p < 0.01, r2 = 0.13).

Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that masticatory efficiency was the highest in patients with Angle¡¯s Class I malocclusion, followed by those with Angle¡¯s Class II and Angle¡¯s Class III malocclusions. Moreover, a weak positive correlation was observed between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area.

Å°¿öµå

Mastication; Efficiency; Angle's classification; Contact area

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed